Lefevre v. Rosen, Esq.
Plaintiff: Sudane Lefevre
Defendant: Larry Rosen, Esq.
Case Number: 1:2014cv01311
Filed: October 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That Lefevre's 23 request to file a surreply is DENIED. That Rosen's 8 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. That Lefevre's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 16) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/15/2015. (jel, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lefevre v. Rosen, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sudane Lefevre
Represented By: Peter P. LoDuca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Rosen, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?