Swergold v. DiNapoli et al
| Nathaniel M. Swergold |
| Thomas P. DiNapoli, Kevin F. Murray, Robert Coughlin and Luke Bierman |
| 1:2014cv01410 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 19 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' cross-motion to amend the answer pursuant to rule 15 of the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure is GRANTED, and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' cross-motion to dismiss pursuant to rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED, and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED, and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/5/2015. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
