Balaban v. Local 1104
| Utku Balaban |
| Local 1104 |
| 3:2009cv00372 |
| March 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Labor: Reporting/Disclosure Office |
| Broome |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| David E. Peebles |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
DECISION AND ORDER granting Deft's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Pltf's 44 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/7/09. [Served Pltf by mail.] (sfp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Balaban v. Local 1104 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Utku Balaban | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Local 1104 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
