Jones v. Phelps Corporation et al
| Robert Dillard Jones |
| Phelps Corporation and Russell Phelps |
| 3:2014cv00084 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Broome |
| David E. Peebles |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Foreclosure |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1471 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - ORDERED that Broome County's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Phelps Corporations motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Jones' amended complaint (Dkt. No. 5) is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/19/2014. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
3
SUMMARY ORDER - That Jones' complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. That Jones may, if he should so choose, file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Summary Order. That if Jones fails to file an amended complaint wi thin the thirty-day-period provided, the Clerk is directed to close this case without further order of the court. That Jones' pending motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/3/2014. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
