Abboud v. County of Onondaga, New York et al
| Noel Abboud |
| County of Onondaga, New York, Timothy H. Cowin, Daniel B. Boyle, Randy W. Blume, Lieutenant Hawker, Sergeant Zabinski, Lieutenant Brush, Captain Tripoli, Corrections Officer Pritchard, Corrections Officer Riposa, John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s) |
| 5:2014cv00193 |
| February 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That defendants' 68 motion for summary judgment is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART as follows: DENIED with respect to (1) Abboud's discrimination claims pursuant to Title VII, Section 198 1, and Section 1983 against Hawker and the County based only his omission from the 2013 firearms qualification list; (2) Abboud's hostile work environment claims against the County, Cowin, Riposa, Hawker, Brush, Brockway, Zabinski, and Burnett; and (3) Abboud's retaliation claims pursuant to Title VII, Section 1981, and Section 1983, against the County, Cowin, and Hawker based only on his omission from the 2013 firearms qualification list, the medical examination, and restricted duty assignment; and GRANTED in all other respects. That this case is now deemed trial-ready and a scheduling order will be issued in due course. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/27/2018. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
