Roach v. Clark et al
| Matthew J. Roach |
| Jennifer Clark, Mary Woodfork, Christopher Warren, Victoria Snyder, Margarita Gonzalez, Jennifer Doe, John or Jane Doe, David Sutkowy, Ronnie White, Jr., Michelle Pirro Bailey and Onondaga County |
| 5:2015cv00408 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Clark, Warren, Snyder, Gonzales, Woodfork, and Onondaga County are DISMISSED without pr ejudice and with leave to replead pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Pirro-Bailey, White, Jennifer Doe, John Doe, and Sutkowy are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 1) for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 02, 2015.***A copy of this order & subsequent judgment was served upon the pro se plaintiff by Certified US mail. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
