Ditech Financial LLC v. Sterly et al
Plaintiff: Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant: Devon Sterly and Synchrony Bank
Case Number: 5:2015cv01455
Filed: December 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 20 Motion for Default Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 35) of the Court's December 23, 2016 Memorandum- Decision and Orde r (Dkt. No. 25) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 20) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close th is case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of Onondaga County in the State of New York shall not vacate the notice of pendency filed on December 8, 2015; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on the Clerk of Onondaga County in the State of New York by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and file the returned receipt using the Court's electronic filing system; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/2/2018. (ban)
December 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of Onondaga County in the State of New York va cate Plaintiff's notice of pendency filed on December 8, 2015; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the Clerk of Onondaga County in the State of New York by Certified Mail, Re turn Receipt Requested, and file the returned receipt using the Court's electronic filing system; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff is permitted to resubmit this motion for default judgment upon the submission of a letter indicating that request together with a copy of a properly filed notice of pendency. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/23/2016. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ditech Financial LLC v. Sterly et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ditech Financial LLC
Represented By: Keith R. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Devon Sterly
Represented By: Mary Lannon Fangio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?