Coulter v. Barbeque Integrated, Inc.
| Cheryl A. Coulter |
| Barbeque Integrated, Inc. and Barbeque Integrated, Inc. doing business as Smokey Bones |
| 5:2020cv00533 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Rule 16 Initial Conference set for 6/15/2020 at 10:30 AM by telephone before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/8/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (sfp, )
|
|
***Answer due date updated for Barbeque Integrated, Inc. answer due 5/18/2020. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing 3
FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Barbeque Integrated, Inc.. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing 2
STATE COURT COMPLAINT. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oswego County Supreme Court, case number EFC-2020-0481 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 5114931) filed by Barbeque Integrated, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(sfp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
