Orcutt et al v. National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. et al
Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum displayed the expiration date of Plaintiff's personal credit/debit cards on paper receipts at the point of sale, in violation of the truncation requirements under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA).
| Justin Orcutt and Sara Cook |
| National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. and John Doe 1 thru 10 |
| 6:2012cv00513 |
| March 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| Fulton |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 7/25/2012 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan due by 7/11/2012. (see) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. (see) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against John Doe 1 thru 10 and National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. (Filing fee $350 receipt number 0206-2137685) filed by Justin Orcutt and Sara Cook. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(see) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
