Allborty v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Christy Allborty
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 6:2014cv01428
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DECISION and ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff disability benefits be REMANDED pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for a proper evaluation of the medical opinion and other evidence, and other further proceedings, consistent with the 14 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/22/2016. (dpk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allborty v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christy Allborty
Represented By: Peter W. Antonowicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?