Pritchard v. Town of New Hartford
Plaintiff: Neil E. Pritchard
Defendant: Town of New Hartford
Case Number: 6:2014cv01477
Filed: December 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 87 JUDGMENT: in favor of Town of New Hartford and Joe Booth against Neil E. Pritchard. For the reasons stated in the # 86 Decision and Order, it is ORDERED that Defendants' # 78 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.] (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pritchard v. Town of New Hartford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neil E. Pritchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of New Hartford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?