Shenko v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Linda J. Shenko |
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security, John and Jane Does, Town of New Hartford, New Hartford Police Dept. and Officer Freiberger |
6:2014cv01595 |
December 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Utica Office |
Oneida |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 40) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 34) is DISMISSED in its entirety without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further ORDERED, that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims without prejudice to the re-filing of the claims in state court; and it is further ORD ERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Request (Dkt. No. 35) seeking to amend the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on April 18, 2016.***A copy of this order & subsequent judgment was served upon the pro se party by Certified US Mail & Regular US Mail. (sas) |
Filing 20 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 5) is DISMISSED with leave to amend claims against the FBI, Homeland Security, the To wn of New Hartford, and Officer Freiberger; and is DISMISSED without leave to amend claims against the New Hartford Police Department; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amendment (Dkt. No. 12) to claim and Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 14) are STRICKEN from the docket as improper pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file one amended complaint in accordance with the Report-Recommendation; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Brief (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Request (Dkt. No. 19) for permission to resubmit an amended complaint is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 18, 2015.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.