Momrow v. The County of Rensselaer et al
| Charles Momrow |
| The County of Rensselaer, Jack Mahar, Elaine Young and David Hetman |
| 8:2015cv00521 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Plattsburgh Office |
| Clinton |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That McLean's 72 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. That Young's 69 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. That Mahar and the County's 68 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: DENIED as it relates to Momrow's Section 1983 claim against the County; and GRANTED in all other respects. That the Clerk terminate McLean and Mahar as parties to this action. That this action is deemed trial ready and scheduling order shall issue in due course. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/7/2018. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That the moving defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. That the parties contact Magsitrate Judge Daniel Stewart to schedule further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/30/2016. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
