Shoults v. Anderson et al
| Michael Shoults, Jr. |
| Eldrige T. Anderson, Pang L. Kooi and Carl J. Koegnismann |
| 9:2014cv01184 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Cayuga |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 30 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 25 ) is GRANTED and the complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/16/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 18 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 12 ) based upon Plaintiff's failure to exhaust available administrative rem edies prior to bringing this action is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to renew at a later date upon a fuller record. ORDERED that defendants shall file an answer to the complaint as permitted under the Federal Laws of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/23/16. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
