Gerena et al v. Sullivan et al
| Charles W. Gerena, Richard Pellegrino, Donald Brusso, Justin A. Rathbun and Richard Valle |
| Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Donna Hall, Naomi J. Freeman, Christopher Kunkle, Maureen A. Bosco, Terri B. Maxymillian, Christopher Fullem, Timothy J. Lamitie, Jeffrey L. Nowicki and Charmaine A. Bill |
| 9:2015cv00489 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Oneida |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Christian F. Hummel |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED consistent with this Decision and Order. ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 34 ) is GRANTED. ORDERED, that Plaintiffs� 39; Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED, that Plaintiffs shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Decision and Order to file an amended complaint. ORDERED, that if Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint wi thin the time allowed under this Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Defendants and close this action without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 9/20/16. (served on non-ecf parties by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
