Ghee v. McAuliffe
| Jeffrey Ghee and Jeffrey D. Ghee |
| N.Y.S. D.O.C.S. |
| 9:2023cv00505 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Letter from Ghee regarding the notices of appearance filed. Updated copy of docket sheet provided. (nas )
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel P. Hughes on behalf of Brian McAuliffe (Hughes, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel P. Hughes on behalf of Brian McAuliffe (Hughes, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Jeffrey Ghee Effective Date May 14, 2023 Old Address: Riverview Correctional Facility New Address: Cayuga Correctional Facility. Updated copy of docket sheet served on petitioner. (nas )
|
|
Filing 5
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk respectfully serve a copy of this Decision and Order on petitioner in accordance with the Local Rules. ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance withSection XIII, Rule 1.1(d) of the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve a limited answer to the petition, addressing the issue of timeliness, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's limited answer. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on May 9, 2023. (Attachments: #1 petition, #2 exhibits)[ response due by Brian McAuliffe served on 5/9/2023, answer due 8/7/2023]{served as directed}(nas)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on May 3, 2023. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas )
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from Ghee enclosing the filing fee. (nas, )
|
|
Filing fee received from Riverview CF on behalf of Ghee: $ 5.00, receipt number 500000370 (nas, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on April 26, 2023. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffrey Ghee. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 envelope)(nas )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
