Chowdhry v. The People of New York
| Riazul Haq Chowdhry |
| The People of New York |
| United States Of America |
| 1:2014cv06078 |
| July 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #105306. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner's motion is denied. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/11/2015) (rjm) Modified on 3/11/2015 (ca).
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner's mo tion is denied. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/22/2015) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
