Cases 1 - 10 of 470,615
Ayika v. United States o America
as 4:2025cv00125
Petitioner:
Peter Victor Ayika
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fang v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00641
Plaintiff:
Deanna C. Fang
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 rt IRS: Refund Taxes
United States of America v. Approximately $19,100.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2025at00370
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $19,100.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Chester Young v. United States of America
as 5:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
Chester Young
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
BAILEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2025cv00071
Petitioner:
CALVIN BAILEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. Real et al
as 0:2025cv60519
Defendant:
Jasper Real and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Real v. United State of America
as 1:2025cv21286
Plaintiff:
Jasper Real
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Real v. United States Of America
as 1:2025cv21287
Defendant:
Jasper Real and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Hunt v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv01460
Petitioner:
Derrick Hunt and Derrick Martin Hunt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 97,417.246135 Tether USDT Seized from TRON Address TXb8SULXwZK2LqQZE6ugsLe78pNJnBkun2
as 4:2025cv00063
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
97,417.246135 Tether USDT Seized from TRON Address TXbSULXwZK2LqQZE6ugsLe78pNJnBkun2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
