Schwartzman et al v. Label, LLC et al
| Brad Schwartzman and Trusgan, Inc. |
| Label, LLC, Label, NY. LLC, David Miller, Jeremy Miller, Automatic Data Processing, Inc., ADP, LLC and Colin Barnett |
| 1:2015cv05793 |
| July 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
OPINION & ORDER for 131 Report and Recommendations. I have reviewed Judge Aaron's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review, find none. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk's Office is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/3/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 129 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/17/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 123 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. The post-discovery conference scheduled for Friday December 6, 2019, is adjourned toFriday January 17, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. (Status Conference set for 1/17/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Vernon S. Broderick.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/3/2019) (rro)
|
|
Filing
89
OPINION & ORDER re: 62 MOTION to Dismiss; 66 MOTION to Dismiss Label's Counterclaims: For the foregoing reasons, the ADP Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is granted with respect to all claims except Plaintiffs' claim for defamation (Fourth Count). To the extent Plaintiffs seek to amend the Complaint to add certain facts related to their defamation claim, (Pls.' Opp. 25), their motion is GRANTED and they may amend th e complaint within thirty (30) days of this Opinion & Order. Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the Label Defendants' Counterclaims is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Lanham Act claims are dismissed, but the Label Defendants may amend th e Counterclaims with respect to false advertising under the Lanham Act within thirty (30) days of this Opinion & Order. The motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to the Label Defendants' other state law counterclaims. The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding discovery and file a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order within forty-five (45) days of this Opinion & Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions. (Docs. 62, 66.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/30/2018) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
