Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Arroyo v. Schrumph et al
as 4:2026cv05630
Plaintiff:
Neftali Arroyo
Defendant:
Brian Schrumph, David Miller, Henry Perez doing business as John Patout and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cannon v. Pate et al
as 5:2026ct03210
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cannon
Defendant:
Imelda Pate, Kimberly Benton, Ryan Herrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03447
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beazley Excess and Surplus Insurance, Inc. et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv22426
Plaintiff:
Beazley Excess and Surplus Insurance, Inc. and Beazley Underwriting Ltd.
Defendant:
David Miller and Grace Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanders et al v. Beach et al
as 3:2025cv02049
Plaintiff:
Taheera Sanders and David Miller
Defendant:
Deontaye Beach and Organics Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Miller v. The Dental Dept at WCI et al
as 1:2025cv03622
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
The Dental Dept at WCI and Dr. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv03003
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marck v. Montoya, et al
as 25-1348
Plaintiff:
RYAN MARCK
Defendant:
LORI MONTOYA, in her individual and official capacities, MEREDITH STEFFAN, individual and official capacities, KAREN STALL, Guardian Ad Litem, I and O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
