Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Miller v. Stevens et al
as 2:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Gloria Stevens, Randy Johnson, Sheriff Dept. Jasper County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mississippi Resources, LLC
as 5:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Mississippi Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Seigen 7 Development, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00603
Plaintiff:
David Miller and Linda Miller
Defendant:
Seigen 7 Development, LLC , Tom Guerin and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Seigen 7 Development, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
David Miller and Linda Miller
Defendant:
Seigen 7 Development, LLC , Tom Guerin , John Does 1-10 and others
Counter_claimant:
Seigen 7 Development, LLC and Tom Guerin
Counter_defendant:
David Miller and Linda Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. McComb Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Kevin Leigh Williams
Defendant:
McComb Police Department, City of McComb, David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baudoin v. Miller
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Baudoin
Defendant:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baudoin v. Miller et al
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Baudoin
Defendant:
David Miller and Derrick Mingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Miller
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Vince A. Moore
Defendant:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick v. Stogner et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
George Thomas Fredrick
Defendant:
Laura Stogner, David Miller, Marion Walthall Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
