Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Doe 1 et al
Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishing Group, LLC, McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC, Cengage Learning, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc. and Elsevier Inc. |
Cameron Wesley Roberts, Benjamin Barrett Roberts, Doe 8, Flipping Pages Inc., Doe 2, Doe 7, Doe 11, Doe 1, Unitystore Inc., Doe 3, Tierney M. Rowles, Doe 6, Doe 10, Carlos A. Corrasco, Doe 5, Spencer J. Rowles, Robert D. Meadows, Wesley Rowles, Doe 4, Doe 9, Carla M. Rowles and Borgasorus Books, Inc. |
1:2018cv07380 |
August 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
NewYork |
Paul G Gardephe |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.