Cases 1 - 10 of 10,910
Croom v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
DeeDee Brookhart, Kyle Henton, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00379
Plaintiff:
Khalil Powell
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General Store 2959, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spedden v. Terra et al
as 2:2025cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael Spedden
Defendant:
Superintendent Joseph Terra, Deputy Superintenden Charles Hensley, Unit Manager Fedder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Rose v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2025cv00172
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Baltimore County, Officer Kawonda Sears, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AA 102 v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2025cv00403
Defendant:
DOE 4, DOE 1, DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
JANE ROE AA 102
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Torres v. Wilson et al
as 3:2025cv00057
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Sargeant Louie, C/O Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Smith v. John Doe 1, et al
as 25-1068
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, "Brian," Staff on Duty, JOHN DOE 2, "Shane," Management and UNITED CARING SERVICES
Major v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2025cv00056
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1, John or Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Kylen Major
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Hall et al
as 4:2025cv00019
Defendant:
John Doe 5, Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners, John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Everett Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Maston
as 25-88
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Federal Agent DOE #4, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
