Gibson v. Travis
| Dana Gibson |
| D. Travis, S. Sassi, K. Mitchell, R. Ulysse, J. Wiand, D. Cook, A. Gamble, C. Strauss, A. Perez, J. Gonzalez, J. D'Bryan, J. Cavaleri, Alvert Prack and Nancy Heywood |
| 7:2014cv08764 |
| October 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Erie |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 37 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by J. D'Bryan, J. Wiand, Nancy Heywood, D. Travis, C. Strauss, J. Gonzalez, A. Gamble, R. Ulysse, J. Cavaleri, D. Cook, K. Mitchell, S. Sassi, Alvert Prack, A. Pere z. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to plaintiff's excessive force claim against defendant Perez and as to plaintiff's procedural due process claims against defendants Prack and Heywood. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as to plaintiff 's procedural due process claims against defendants Gonzalez, O'Bryan, and Cavaleri. By separate order, the Court will schedule an initial conference for the purpose of setting a discovery plan and scheduling order. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #37), and to terminate defendants A. Perez, Albert Prack, and Nancy J. Heywood. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 2/24/2016) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
