Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gibson v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01502
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, The Cooper Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Darri McGuire, Parris Price, Jason Pequeen and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Jefferson County Board of Education et al
as 3:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
Starr Watkins
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education , Paige Hartstern , Dana Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibson v. Heary et al
as 1:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Defendant:
Nicole A. Heary, Robert D. Siglin, C.K. Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01246
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Lempke
as 1:2014cv07013
Petitioner:
Dana Gibson
Respondent:
John B. Lempke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Travis
as 7:2014cv08764
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Defendant:
D. Travis, S. Sassi, K. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Rosati
as 9:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Defendant:
C. Rosati, D. Maguire, P. McNally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Yackeren et al
as 1:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Defendant:
Craig E. Yackeren, S. Markowski, Mark L. Bradt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
