Robert Testa v. Lawrence Becker et al
Robert Testa |
Lawrence Becker and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan |
6:2010cv06229 |
April 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and costs 59 is granted. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $148,736.00, and costs in the amount of $689.32, for a total award of $149,425.32. Defendants are hereby directed to pay that amount to the Law Offices of John A. Strain, P.C. within thirty (30) days after the date of entry of this Decision and Order. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 11/6/2017. (KAH) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting plaintiff's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying defendants' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 5/9/17. (EMA)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 44 ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's first, second and fourth causes of action are dismissed. The motion is denied as to the third cause of action, insofar as that cause of action sets forth a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), as set forth in the body of this Decision and Order. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/30/13. (EMA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.