Featherly v. Astrue

Featherly v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Larry A. Featherly
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	6:2010cv06302
Filed:	June 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Monroe
Presiding Judge:	David G. Larimer
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2013	Filing 16 ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $27,543.50. The award is to be made payable to Mark M. McDonald, Esq., attorney for plaintiff. If counsel has not already refunded the amount of previously-awarded EAJA fees 10 to the plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412, counsel is directed to do so now. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/23/13. (EMA)
June 23, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice the Commissioner's 5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting plaintiff's 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Upon remand, the Commissioner is instructed to render an opinion which includes a statement explaining why, and to what extent, the opinions of plaintiff's various physicians were accepted or rejected. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/23/11. (EMA)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2013

Filing 16 ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $27,543.50. The award is to be made payable to Mark M. McDonald, Esq., attorney for plaintiff. If counsel has not already refunded the amount of previously-awarded EAJA fees 10 to the plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412, counsel is directed to do so now. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/23/13. (EMA)

June 23, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice the Commissioner's 5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting plaintiff's 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Upon remand, the Commissioner is instructed to render an opinion which includes a statement explaining why, and to what extent, the opinions of plaintiff's various physicians were accepted or rejected. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/23/11. (EMA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Featherly v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry A. Featherly
Represented By:	Mark M. McDonald
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?