Fludd v. Fischer et al
Jovan Fludd |
Brian Fischer, Anthony Annucci, Robert Kirkpatrick, Martin Kearney, Joseph Noeth, Curtis Drown, Thomas Sticht, Karen Crowley, Stephen Casaceli, Norman Bezio and James Herring |
6:2010cv06603 |
October 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Albany |
Marian W. Payson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 DECISION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, ECF No. 6, is granted with regard to all of Plaintiffs claims. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/28/12. (KAP) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 33 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court determines that Plaintiff has failed to meet his burden under Rule 65. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/22/12. (KAP) |
Filing 38 DECISION AND ORDER denying 29 Motion for Hearing; denying 29 Motion for TRO. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/15/12. (KAP) |
Filing 24 DECISION AND ORDER denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 11 Motion. The Court will issue a separate decision on the pending motion (Docket No. 6) for summary judgment. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 7/7/11. (KAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.