Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Crowley v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Karen Crowley
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cassidy, Sullivan County, Tennessee, Michael Nygaard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gooden v. Crowley
as 19-3046
Respondent / Appellee:
Karen Crowley
Petitioner / Appellant:
Karl Gooden
Thomas v. Crowley
as 9:2019cv00779
Respondent:
Karen Crowley
Petitioner:
Derrick Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nowlin v. Connolly
as 18-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quintin A. Nowlin
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick Connolly, Benjamin Wilson, Karen Crowley and others
Defendant:
M. Stanton
Torres v. Artus
as 18-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Armando Torres
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Dale Artus, Wende Correctional Facility Thomas Sticht, Deputy Superintendent of Security, Alan Herdzik, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
Virginia Bluff, John Lascala, Social Worker, Jeffrey Mayer and others
Torres v. Artus
as 18-1008
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather Amerlink, R.N., Susan Schumacher, Deptuty of Administration, Superintendent Dale Artus and others
Defendant:
Joyce Veshia, retired, Suana Post, (retired), Nicole White and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Armando Torres
Barnes v. Crowley et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Eben Barnes
Defendant:
Karen Crowley and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowlin v. Connolly et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Quintin A. Nowlin
Defendant:
Patrick Connolly, Benjamin Wilson, M. Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Crowley
as 1:2017cv03298
Respondent:
Karen Crowley
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Crowley
as 6:2017cv06118
Petitioner:
Carl Holmes
Respondent:
Karen Crowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
