Di Sciullo, et al v. Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc., et al
| Alan M. Di Sciullo and Mary Jo Di Sciullo |
| Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc., Daniel Ken Griggs and Debora R. Griggs |
| 2:2014cv00018 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Northern Division Office |
| xxU.S. Outside District |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER granting 92 Motion in Limine; denying 93 Motion in Limine; granting in part and holding in abeyance remaining part 94 Motion in Limine; and denying 97 Motion in Limine - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/9/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 57 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, (DE 57), made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, is GRANTED as to plaintiffs' claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unfa ir and deceptive practices, conversion, fraud, and negligence as to defendant Debora Griggs as an individual. Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, accounting, unjust enrichment, alter ego, and negligence as to defendant Ken Griggs as an in dividual remain outstanding. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report contemplating the scheduling of remaining case activities, also including the utility of any further alternative dispute resolution, within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order. Said report also should include, among other things, the estimated length of trial and proposed term(s) for trial. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/22/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER regarding 45 Motion to Compel; 47 Motion to Withdraw and 49 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Amend Pleadings - The court denies the motion to withdraw. The court now orders the parties to file by the close of bus iness February 11, 2015, your statement as to whether there is agreement to mediation at a date, time, and place certain. The motion to compel is granted in part, denied in part, and dismissed in part. Each party shall bear its own costs. In its disc retion, where discovery is ongoing, and depositions will not be taken until next month, the court permits an extension of the discovery period for the purpose of defendants securing responses to the written discovery recently propounded in advance of the depositions of plaintiffs and defendant Debra R. Griggs. In this part, the motion is allowed. Of its own initiative, the court extends the deadline for filing dispositive motions to April 20, 2015. Defendants have failed to demonstrate good caus e for modifying the scheduling order to allow a motion at this late date to amend the complaint. As such, the motion to amend is denied with one exception. To the extent defendants would seek formally to align the response of defendant Debora R. Griggs, who answered pro se May 9, 2014, with the answer and counterclaim of the other defendants, filed July 30, 2014, in this part amendment will be allowed. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/04/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
