Evans, et al v. PMT Express, LLC, et al
Bessie Evans and S.H. |
PMT Express, LLC, Paul Miller Trucking, Inc. and James Philip Myers, Jr. |
4:2013cv00210 |
September 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Eastern Division Office |
HALIFAX |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER granting 92 Consent Motion to Seal Document 91 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/6/2015. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 83 ORDER granting 81 Motion to Stay - The court GRANTS plaintiffs' motion, and this case, including the pending motion to approve wrongful death settlement, is STAYED for purposes of allowing plaintiffs to file an appropriate action in a state c ourt of proper jurisdiction to determine whether McGee satisfies § 29-19(c) and thus has the right to inherit from Jeanie Evans. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to file a status report no later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order regarding the progress of any state court proceeding under § 29-19(c), and regarding whether a continued stay of the instant action is warranted. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/6/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 45 Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claims and denying as moot without prejudice to renewal 48 Motion for Protective Order - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/24/2013. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.