Wise et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
Dorothy Monroe-Wise and Eddie Wise |
Paula F. Nicholls, Tom Vilsack, Juan M. Garcia, Aaron A. Martin, Mike Huskey, James Davenport, United States Department of Agriculture, Debbie Houston, Cynthia I. Kernodle and Joe Leonard |
4:2013cv00234 |
November 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Eastern Division Office |
NASH |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Agricultural Acts |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING 13 Motion to Dismiss, GRANTING 32 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Stay, DENYING 33 Motion to Stay, and DENYING AS FUTILE 39 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/24/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs, via US Mail, to 2251 Swift Creek School Road, Whitakers, NC, 27891. (Fisher, M.) |
Filing 28 ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to Stay, DENYING 6 Motion for Joinder, DENYING 15 Motion for Default Judgment, DENYING 19 Motion to Enter a Scheduling Order, DENYING 22 Motion to Stay, DENYING 23 Motion for Extension of Time, DENYING 24 Motion f or Evidentiary Hearing, and DENYING 25 Motion to Enter a Scheduling Order. The plaintiffs shall file a substantive response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on or before 8/26/2014. No further requests for delays will be entertained by this Court. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/18/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs via US Mail. (Fisher, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.