General Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Mammoth Grading, Inc., Debtor

Appellant: General Concrete Construction, Inc.
Appellee: Mammoth Grading, Inc., Debtor
Case Number: 5:2010cv00320
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 17 Motion to Consolidate Cases. ALL FUTURE FILINGS TO BE FILED IN LEAD CASE 5:10-316-H ONLY. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 8/25/2010. (Heath, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: General Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Mammoth Grading, Inc., Debtor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: General Concrete Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Todd Allen Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Mammoth Grading, Inc., Debtor
Represented By: Joseph N. Callaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.