Petruzzo v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A., et al
| Mario Petruzzo |
| HealthExtras, Inc., HealthExtras Benefits Administrators, Inc., Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc, HealthExtras Insurance Agency, Inc., Group Insurance Trust, Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., Alliant Services Houston, Inc., Alliant Insurance Services Houston, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company |
| 5:2012cv00113 |
| March 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered May 22, 2015, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that all claims arising in this case are dismissed where plaintiffs lack standing to sue any defendant in this action under Article III of the United States Constitution. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 05/22/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
148
STIPULATION AND DISCOVERY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/17/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER regarding 88 Motion to Amend Class Action Complaint, 104 Motion to Dismiss HealthExtras Insurance Agency, Inc., 105 Motion to Dismiss HealthExtras Benefits Administrators, Inc., 106 Motion to Dismiss Allian t Insurance Services Houston, LLC, and 107 Supplemental Motion to Amend Class Action Complaint - Plaintiff's motions to dismiss (DE 104, 105, 106) provisionally are ALLOWED, where three defendants have been requested to be dismissed with prejudice, and their anticipated dismissals are reflected on the face of the newly proposed amended complaint. Should no cause be offered why the court's provisional allowance of the motions to dismiss is in error, within fourteen (14) days as herein ordered, then those motions finally will be ALLOWED. In its discretion, the court ALLOWS plaintiff's supplemental motion for leave to file his newly proposed first amended complaint, (DE 107), to the extent of his request now to have the court consider this proposed amended complaint in ruling on his motion to amend. The court allows uncontested parts of plaintiff's motion to amend (DE 88) as follows: (a) Plaintiff's motion to amend (DE 88) is ALLOWED in thos e uncontested parts where plaintiff seeks to join Jeffrey and Jeffrey and Kimberley Bush as plaintiffs, join Virginia Surety and HealthExtras, LLC as defendants, and correct errors regarding defendants names, to the extent these changes also are re flected in the proposed amended complaint filed June 20, 2014; (b) Plaintiff's motion to amend (DE 88) is ALLOWED in those uncontested parts where plaintiff seeks to identify National Union Fire InsuranceCompany as a "member," rather t han as a "division," of American International Group, Inc. (AIG), and change the name of defendant identified as Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. to reflect its post-merger entity name, "Catamaran Health Solutions, LLC, f/k/a Catalyst H ealth Solutions, Inc." The court holds in abeyance decision on remaining, contested parts of plaintiff's motion, where defendants have twenty-one (21) days within which to supplement their arguments of record with respect to plaintiff&# 039;s sought-after amendment of complaint, as now reflected in the form of proposed amended complaint filed June 20, 2014. Plaintiffs have fourteen (14) days within which to respond. No reply will be permitted. The STAY on class discovery and other deadlines REMAINS IN EFFECT. Counsel should read attached order in its entirety for additional critical information and deadlines. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/24/2014. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting 90 Motion to Stay Class Discovery and Set Briefing Schedule - Class discovery and all other deadlines under the current Case Management Order, Dkt. 82, are stayed pending the Court's resolution of the Motion to Amend. D efendants shall have until December 20, 2013, to file their responses to the Motion to Amend. Plaintiff shall have until January 17, 2014, to file his reply in support of the Motion to Amend. The stay granted hereby shall be deemed to maintain the current status quo of class discovery and preserve the parties' rights without prejudice until the Court's ruling on the Motion to Amend. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/27/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER adopting 70 Memorandum and Recommendation; denying 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 37 Motion to Dismiss; and denying 39 Motion to Dismiss Counts I through V of the Complaint - The stay is hereby LIFTED. The parties are to file a Joint Supplemental Rule 26(f) Report within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/23/2013. (Tripp, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
