Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources et al
| Rose Acre Farms, Inc. |
| North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources, John E. Skvarla and Tom Reeder |
| 5:2014cv00147 |
| March 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| James C. Dever |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 53] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(l) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Alternatively, the court DISMISSES the action pur suant to its discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act. The court DISMISSES Rose Acre's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 65]. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 7/30/2015. (O'Brien, C.)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER DENYING 50 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; GRANTING 77 Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae; GRANTING 83 Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae; and GRANTING 86 Motion for Leave to File a surreply. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 1/8/15. (O'Brien, C.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Intervene. The Proposed Answer submitted with theMotion shall be filed by the Clerk. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 7/7/2014. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
