Kyle, et al v. McDougall, et al
| Bluguise, LLC and Grant A. Kyle |
| Tek Fusion Global, Inc., Technology Fusion, LLC and Kelly McDougall |
| 5:2014cv00201 |
| April 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Transfer Case; denying 9 Motion to Remand; and denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss - It is therefore ORDERED that this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern Di strict of Virginia. The clerk is DIRECTED to send a certified copy of this order together with the case file to the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News Division. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/23/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER regarding 14 Motion to Stay Briefing on Motion to Transfer Case or, Alternatively, Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Transfer Case - Having considered the issues presented, the court finds good cause to GRANT plaint iffs' motion in the alternative for an extension. Plaintiffs shall have until May 28, 2014, to respond to defendants' motion to transfer. Accordingly, plaintiffs request for stay is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/28/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
