Cruthirds v. Lacey et al
Shelia Y. Cruthirds |
Raymond P. Lacey, Brandi Swart, Kathy J. Shearer, Sondra McMillan, Karen Miller, Child Youth School Services/Directorate Family, Morale, Welfare & Recreation and John M. McHugh |
5:2014cv00260 |
May 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
CUMBERLAND |
W. Earl Britt |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to the courts order dated 5/22/2017, defendants motion to dismiss, (DE #45) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs claim for violation of the FMLA is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claim for breach of contract remains. IT IS FURTHER ORDERERD that the defendants motion to dismiss, (DE # 56), is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Signed by Susan K. Edwards, Deputy for Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/30/2017. Copy sent to Shelia Y. Cruthirds, 3509 Kennicot Road, Fayetteville, NC 28311 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 5/22/2017. Order to plaintiff via US Mail at 3509 Kennicot Road, Fayetteville, NC 28311. (Marsh, K) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying 13 Motion for the US Marshals to serve defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 1/6/2016. Copy of order mailed to plaintiff via US Mail at 3509 Kennicot Road, Fayetteville, NC 28311. (Marsh, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.