Pendergrass v. Sullivan, et al
| James K. Pendergrass, Jr. |
| United States of America and Donald Sullivan |
| 5:2014cv00287 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 01/20/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 44 MOTION to Quash/Dismiss Counterclaim and granting 49 Motion for Clarification - No further responsive pleading to the cross-claim is warranted, and this matter shall proceed to adjudication of the motion for summary judgment by the United States. Defendant Sullivan shall file a response to the motion for summary judgment by January 5, 2015, in accordance with the terms set forth herein. The United States shall file a reply, if any, by January 20, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/02/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Permanent Injunction and denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/16/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; reserving ruling on 24 Motion for Permanent Injunction; granting 4 Motion to Deposit Funds; and denying 14 Motion to Quash and Motion to Dismiss - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/18/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
