Microspace Communications Corporation v. Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd et al
| Microspace Communications Corporation |
| Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd and Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv00535 |
| September 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| James C. Fox |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Order Dismissing Case. The court has been notified that the parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to either party to file a motion to reopen should settlement not be consummated on or before 10/19/2015. Unless a party filed a motion to reopen, counsel are DIRECTED to file their Joint Stipulation of Dismissal on or before that date. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 8/18/2015. (Grady, B.)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer and denying 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket the Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd [DE-26-1] as the new operative answer for GT LTD in this case. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to continue management of this case.Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 8/17/2015. (Grady, B.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
