Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc. v. BlueAlly, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Blue Ally, LLC, Net Direct Systems, LLC, Philip Albert Santoni, Crista Marie Santoni and BlueAlly Direct, LLC
Case Number: 5:2015cv00037
Filed: January 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER granting 198 Motion for Default Judgment. Default Judgment entered against Defendants Philip Albert Santoni and Crista Marie Santoni. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/3/2018. (Collins, S.)
June 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 195 AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc. against BlueAlly Direct, LLC and BlueAlly, LLC. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/22/2018. (Collins, S.)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 193 JUDGMENT in favor of Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc. against BlueAlly Direct, LLC, and BlueAlly, LLC. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/15/2018. (Collins, S.)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 174 ORDER granting 150 Motion in Limine re: Financing Statements - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/12/2018. (Tripp, S.)
November 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [DE91] is GRANTED IN PART on the determinations of law as set forth herein, and it is DENIED IN PART in all remaining respects. Plaintiffs motion to seal [DE96] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As set forth herein, the Expert Report filed at docket entry number 95-6 shall remain under seal. Plaintiff, however, is DIRECTED to file a redacted version of the Expert Report, within 14 days of the date of this order, whic h redacts only those portions of the Expert Report that meet the criteria for sealing as set forth herein. The clerk is DIRECTED to unseal documents filed at DE 95, DE 95-1 through 95-5; and DE 109. In light of the courts decision on plaintiffs motio n for summary judgment, this case now is ripe for entry of an order governing deadlines and procedures for final pretrial conference and trialon all remaining claims. The parties are DIRECTED to confer and file within 14 days of the date of this orde r a joint status report informing of 1) estimated trial length; 2) particular pretrial issues which may require court intervention in advance of trial, if any; and 3) at least three suggested alternative trial dates. In addition, where mediation was noted completed already on the docket, in October 2016, the parties shall specify if they wish to schedule a court-hosted settlement conference or additional alternative dispute resolution procedures in advance of trial, and if so the date for completion of such. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/30/2017. (Collins, S.)
March 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production - Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 3/3/2017. (Baker, C.)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Leave to Take Deposition Outside Discovery Period - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/21/2017. (Baker, C.)
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER granting 77 Motion to Seal 76 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit 6 - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 12/28/2016. (Baker, C.)
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 Motion to Stay regarding 52 ORDER on Motion to Compel - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/23/2016. (Baker, C.)
August 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 49 Motion to Compel the Production of Alter Ego Documents - BlueAlly Defendants shall provide a full answer to Interrogatory No. 4 and produce responsive documents to Requests for Production 11, 12, 13, and 15 within seven days of entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 8/15/2016. (Tripp, S.)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/10/2016. (Baker, C.)
December 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 39 Renewed Motion for Entry of Default as to Philip Albert Santoni and Crista Marie Santoni - Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 12/18/2015. (Baker, C.)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Entry of Default - Arrow's Motion for Entry of Default is ALLOWED solely as to Defendant Net Direct Systems, LLC. The Motion for Entry of Default is DENIED without prejudice as to Defendants Philip Albert Santoni and Crista Marie Santoni. This denial is without prejudice to Arrow to file a renewed motion for entry of default within 30 days. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 11/10/2015. (Baker, C.)
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/22/2015. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc. v. BlueAlly, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Ally, LLC
Represented By: Calvin Scott Meyers
Represented By: Paul K. Sun, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Net Direct Systems, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philip Albert Santoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crista Marie Santoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BlueAlly Direct, LLC
Represented By: Calvin Scott Meyers
Represented By: Paul K. Sun, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew E. Kristianson
Represented By: Monica E. Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?