Ferruccio v. Davis
Deborah Ferruccio |
Tare Davis |
5:2019cv00346 |
August 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw #9 Order for Discovery Plan filed by Tare Davis. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Garcia-Gallont, Rudolf) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion regarding #10 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint,,, Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint and Motion for Withdrawal of Order for Discovery Plan filed by Tare Davis. (Garcia-Gallont, Rudolf) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #11 Response to Motion. CM/ECF does not accommodate certain document combinations, such as 'response and reply' or 'responses and motion'. Counsel is directed to re-file the document using separate docket entries and must use a motion event to file a motion, attaching a proposed order. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint filed by Deborah Ferruccio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Letter from Tare Davis to Noise Ordinance Task Force, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Amended Complaint) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/9/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to Deborah Ferruccio, 297 Davis-Hyman Rd., Norlina, NC 27563. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 8 Financial Disclosure Statement by Tare Davis (Garcia-Gallont, Rudolf) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Tare Davis. (Garcia-Gallont, Rudolf) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Rudolf A. Garcia-Gallont on behalf of Tare Davis. (Garcia-Gallont, Rudolf) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tare Davis. Summons issued at intake. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Deborah Ferruccio. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Deborah Ferruccio. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tare Davis (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number RAL073422), filed by Deborah Ferruccio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Warren County Ordinance for the Regulation of Sound Crossing Real Property Boundaries, #2 Exhibit 2- Photograph of Plaintiff's Road with Security, #3 Exhibit 3- Map of Plaintiff's and Afton Area Property, #4 Exhibit 4- Plaintiff's Shared Farm Road, known as Davis-Hyman Road, #5 Exhibit 5- Photograph of Plaintiff's Property, #6 Exhibit 6- Facebook Cyber Threat to Ferruccios filed as to Complaint to FBI, #7 Exhibit 7- Notice of Decision, #8 Exhibit 8- 4/18/2018 Work Session/Meeting Item #7-A Recommendations from County Attorney, #9 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ferruccio v. Davis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tare Davis | |
Represented By: | Rudolf A. Garcia-Gallont |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Ferruccio | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.