Gipson v. Onslow County et al
Alfred Gipson |
Onslow County, Onslow County Sheriff's Department, Onslow County Sheriff and Does 1 through 10 |
7:2013cv00044 |
March 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
ONSLOW |
James C. Dever |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that in accordance with the courts order entered on August 5, 2014, Defendants motion to dismiss [D.E. 42] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 49] is GRANTED. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 3/20/15. (O'Brien, C.) |
Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING: 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court has reviewed the record and the governing law. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 49 is GRANTED. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/19/15. (O'Brien, C.) Modified on 3/19/2015 (O'Brien, C.). |
Filing 47 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with the court's order entered on August 5, 2014 that defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 8/6/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 46 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/5/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.