ASICS AMERICA CORPORATION v. AKEVA L.L.C.
Plaintiff: ASICS AMERICA CORPORATION
Defendant: AKEVA L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00135
Filed: February 21, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Patent Office
County: Alamance
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: P. TREVOR SHARP
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 316 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE signed on 3/29/2019. RECOMMENDED that with respect to the '126 patent, the term "rear sole secured" be construed to mean "rear sole selectively or permanently fastened, but not permanently fixed into position," which would not include conventional rear soles that do not either detach or rotate. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 298 ) and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 304 ) be granted as to Akeva's infringement claims, and that Akeva's Third Amended Counterclaim for Patent Infringement be dismissed with preju dice. ORDERED that the stay in this case is extended until April 28, 2019, and the remaining parties are directed to confer with one another and with the mediator to determine whether any further mediation is worthwhile before preparing objections and any other appeals of the present Recommendation. The parties may request that the stay be extended to accommodate further mediation, but if no such request is filed, objections will be due on May 13, 2019. (Daniel, J)
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 248 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 3/9/2015. RECOMMENDED that Counterclaim Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 195 ] be denied. ORDERED that the Court adopts the P arties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report [Doc. # 227 ] to the extent set out above. As a result, the Parties' Motion for Status Conference [Doc. # 241 ] is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to the Parties filing a further request for a Status Conference if additional matters remain for resolution by the Court. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASICS AMERICA CORPORATION v. AKEVA L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASICS AMERICA CORPORATION
Represented By: JOHN S. BUFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKEVA L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?