PEGGS v. INGLE et al
JAMES PEGGS, SR. |
GRADY I INGLE, SHAPIRO & INGLE, GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, CEO, PRESIDENT AND SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, JOHN AND JAND DOES (1-25), DAVID CHURCHILL, WANDA LOCKLEAR, TERRI NANCE, MOSES MASSEY and DEPUTIES OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GUILFORD COUNTY |
1:2009cv00327 |
May 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
P. TREVOR SHARP |
UNASSIGNED |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER AND RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 9/30/09 re 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by DEPUTIES OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GUILFORD COUNTY be granted, 34 MOTION for Sanctions filed by DEPUTIES OF TH E SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GUILFORD COUNTY be granted in the amount of $1,500; that the Court in its discretion impose upon Plaintiff Peggs the pre-filing injunction described above; and that this action be dismissed with prejudice., 11 MOTI ON to Dismiss filed by GRADY I INGLE, SHAPIRO & INGLE be granted, 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by MOSES MASSEY, TERRI NANCE, WANDA LOCKLEAR, DAVID CHURCHILL be granted, 25 Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, CEO, PRESIDENT AND SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS be granted. (Wilson, JoAnne) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.