UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel COMPLIN v. NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL and THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY |
1:2009cv00420 |
June 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Forsyth |
L. PATRICK AULD |
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 2/4/2018. ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 83 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's objections, (Doc. [[86 ]), are OVERRULED. FURTHER that Defendant NCBH's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 64 ), and Defendant CHS's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 67 ), are GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 62 ), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Butler, Carol) |
Filing 83 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 12/20/2016. RECOMMENDED that Baptist's Motion (Docket Entry 64 ) and CHS's Motion (Docket Entry 67 ) be granted and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Butler, Carol) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.