J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SANTILLAN, et al
| J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. |
| LUCIA SANTILLAN and LA REGIA CORP. |
| 1:2011cv01141 |
| December 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| UNASSIGNED |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/17/2013 ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 21 ; that Defendant Lucia Santillan's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, in that the court dismisses the claim of conversion with prejudice, but permits Plaintiff to amend the Cable Act claims. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION & RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 12/28/2012, recommending that Defendant Lucia Santillan's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 17 ) be granted in part and denied in part, in that the Court should dismiss the claim of conversion with prejudice, but should permit Plaintiff to amend the Cable Act claims. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 7/11/2012; that Defendant Lucia Santillan's Motion for Relief from the Entry of Default is GRANTED. Defendant Santillan shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by July 18, 2012. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
