DAVIS, et al v. CITY OF GREENSBORO
BRETT DAVIS, BRIAN CHRIS SMOOT and STEVE SZYMECZEK |
CITY OF GREENSBORO |
1:2012cv00888 |
August 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
JAMES A. BEATY |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 7/15/2015; The City had no contract with the plaintiffs to provide career-long longevity payments and breached no contract with the plaintiffs when it changed the longevity program. The City is entitled to summary judgment on all claims that depend on the existence of such a contract. The Court will enter judgment as time permits and as is otherwise appropriate. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 05/28/2013 as set out herein. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 20 ), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, specifically: 1. The m otion is granted as to Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action, (Doc. 18 at 92-95),which alleges an FLSA violation relating to off-duty pay, and that claim isDISMISSED. 2. The motion is granted as to the equal protection claims alleged in Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action, (id. at 84-87), and Fourth Cause of Action, (id. at 96-99), and those claims are DISMISSED.3. As to all other causes of action, the motion is DENIED.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.