HOLT v. ASTRUE
| LISA M. HOLT |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2012cv01001 |
| September 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Lee |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 02/24/2015. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED and that Defendant's Motio n for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings relating to (1) Plaintiff' ;s nausea and its impact on her RFC determination, (2) CE medical opinion evidence, and (3) determination of Plaintiff's credibility in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. This case is also remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to permit the Commissioner to consider the post-hearing evidence regarding Plaintiffs use of a cane. A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
