FLATIRON-LANE v. CASE ATLANTIC COMPANY et al
| FLATIRON-LANE |
| CASE ATLANTIC COMPANY and FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND |
| 1:2012cv01234 |
| November 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Davidson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 8/4/2015, that Case shall recover $306,717.34 from FLJV; F&D; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America; Federal Insurance Company; Zurich America Insurance Company; an d Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, each of which is jointly and severally liable. Any motion for recovery of costs, interest, or attorney's fees on this award shall be filed within fourteen days of entry of Judgment, in accordance with the Local Rules. Further briefing by the parties is permitted pursuant to Local Rules 7.2 and 7.3. A Judgment in conformance with this Order will be entered simultaneously. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE signed on 2/24/2015. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that FLJV's First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Damages (Doc. # 68 ) and FLJV's Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Case's Termination for Convenience Counterclaim (Doc. # 71 ) be DENIED.(Daniel, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
