JENKINS v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: PORTIA D JENKINS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 1:2012cv01251
Filed: November 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 6/3/2015. ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 15 ) is ADOPTED IN PART. FURTHER that Defendant's decision finding no disa bility is REVERSED and that this matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings, consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order, to determine whether Plaintiff had def icits in adaptive functioning that satisfy the disability listing in 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 1, § 12.05C, including, but not limited to, specifically addressing the opinion of Dr. Villarosa. As a result, Defendant's moti on for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 12 ) is DENIED and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as this court declines to enter an immediate award of benefits. A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith. (Butler, Carol)
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 2/2/2015; that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket Entry 12 ) be granted, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket Entry 10 ) be denied, and this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Sheets, Jamie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JENKINS v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PORTIA D JENKINS
Represented By: JASON LEE WILSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?